Robots are the most critical cybersecurity frontier.
A compromised server leaks data. A compromised robot can kill — it welds, lifts, drives, or operates on a patient. Security flaws become safety risks in robotics. Below, we quantify how fast that frontier is widening, using the world's robot-vulnerability records.
Robot vulnerabilities over time
New disclosures per year (bars) and the cumulative total (line), aggregated across sources.
Sources: RVD, NVD (robot keywords) & EUVD — 548 records, deduplicated by CVE.Severity distribution
Robot vulnerabilities by CVSS / RVSS severity band.
Severity from source metadata (NVD CVSS, RVD RVSS, EUVD base score).Coverage by source
This lab does not rely on any single database — it fuses several, the way zerodayclock.com does for IT, but focused on robots.
RVD (github.com/aliasrobotics/rvd) · NVD (nvd.nist.gov) · EUVD (euvd.enisa.europa.eu) · CISA KEV cross-referenced.Why robots are different
In IT, the worst case is data loss. In robotics, the worst case is a machine that hurts someone. Robots fuse IT, OT and IoT attack surfaces and add actuation, so the same bug class carries far more consequence — which is why we treat every robot security flaw as a safety defect.
See Reviewing the status of robot cybersecurity, Safety requires security in robotics, and the Milestones of how the threat escalated.
Explore all 548 vulnerabilities →